Re: [1/2] dimm.idl: Add IActiveIMMMessagePumpOwner.

[Nikolay Sivov]

On 24.06.2015 0:58, Thomas Faber wrote:
> On 2015-06-23 23:51, Nikolay Sivov wrote:
> > What's a reason for having it declared like that:
> >
> > --
> > - HRESULT OnTranslateMessage([in] const struct tagMSG *pMsg);
> >
> > Why not use MSG*?
>
> Hmm I thought the compiler was complaining about not knowing MSG, but I
> must have imagined that, it's building fine now.
> I don't think it really makes a difference, but I can resend with that
> fixed in both files if you think it's cleaner.

Yes, I think there's no reason not to match SDK in that regard.
> [
> - object,
> - uuid(b5cf2cfa-8aeb-11d1-9364-0060b067b86e),
> - pointer_default(unique),
> - local
>
> +]

Why local? SDK idl doesn't have it.
> - HRESULT OnTranslateMessage([in] const struct tagMSG *pMsg);
> - HRESULT Pause([out] DWORD *pwdCookie);
> - HRESULT Resume([in] DWORD dwCookie);

Also please don't use prefixed notation, 'msg' and 'cookie' (in Pause 
and Resume) would be better.
> Thanks,
> Thomas