Le mer 19/06/2002 à 12:25, Andreas Mohr a écrit :
On Wed, Jun 19, 2002 at 12:45:50AM +0200, Sylvain Petreolle wrote:
So it's definitely NOT trivial to stub (except if you plan to return 'not supported' :-) ).
Lionel Ulmer - http://www.bbrox.org/It's exactly what I want to do - for now the program crashes at 0xdeadbeef. I would just get the message 'xxx unsupported' instead of crash. Jesus, with winedump I only saw 5 exports - if I have the method that's defininitevly not a huge work ;))
Well, why not just think instead of asking ? ;-) Any of those patches "added dll XXX" would do... (CVS notification does include patch URLs for review)
He'll have the output, but not the method or the tools to do such a thing on another dll. If I give you a Caramilk, you won't necessarily be able to put some caramel inside it. Bad analogy, but you should get the point.
Vincent