Yes it does! exactly the same. Sorry! I checked, and double checked, by diffing against Last CVS. But I didn't realize winegcc went such a long way.
In any way I wish it would be an header. dllimport/dllexport gives me a warning even with -fms-extensions. In an header I could turn that off. Also later today I will submit "uuidof" and "declspec ( property () )". These must go in an header, but they can be on the side and manually included by those who needs them. Should I submit them to MinGW they might have use for them too.
Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
On January 1, 2004 07:42 am, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
In short __declspec( selectany ) && __declspec( thread )
These are supported just fine by winegcc, what's wrong with it? AFACT, it's supported exactly the same way as in your patch...