Re: Fix for bug 824 - proper handling of REG_MULTI_SZ

[Alexandre Julliard]

"Dimitrie O. Paun"  writes:
> What about supporting regular C escaping rules? It would be pretty
> consistent with the file format, and frankly I'd expect that to
> be supported (speaking as a Unix user). As for processing overhead,
> I'd be surprised if it shows on the radar.

It's pretty much supported already. This doesn't really solve the
problem of getting rid of the terminating null (except if you want to
require always specifying the null explicitly, but that's not
backwards compatible).