Re: setupapi.dll: partially implement SetupDiGetClassDevsExA

[Dmitry Timoshkov]

"Saulius Krasuckas"  wrote:
> > Using test cases to determine the behaviour of Windows provides a way to 
> > verify both the code that's written today, and code that will be written 
> > a year later.  It's not just legally better, it's easier to do, easier 
> > for others to understand, and gives us a way to verify our code.
>
> Yes, but how would you write a test for a badly implemented function, when 
> you don't know its name or even name of a DLL it resides in?

Then by what means do you know that the API is misbehaving?