Re: Powrprof patches

[Alexandre Julliard]

Stefan Dösinger  writes:
> > Am 19.02.2025 um 23:38 schrieb robert lippmann :
> >
> > Some more follow up questions:
> > - Since there are a lot of new functions added, should I do an
> >
> > initial patch with winedump producing skeleton code, and have each
> > function just return ERROR_CALL_NOT_IMPLEMENTED?  And then do follow
> > on patches to implement?  Or just do the implementation at the same
> > time?  From a review standpoint, I imagine the first approach is
> > better.
>
> The first approach is generally better. Make sure that every function writes a FIXME to make it obvious a stub is called.

Unless it's a COM interface, you don't want to add skeleton code. Just
list the functions as stub in the spec file, and implement only the ones
that are called by the application.