Re: Kernel 2.6.9 - Issue Found

[Mike Hearn]

On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 17:57:53 -0700, Jesse Allen wrote:
> It doesn't seem to fix the copy protection problem.  So I'm wondering a few 
> things.  Does wine need to be patched?  This new patch seems to be related to 
> a chunk of code added in patch #2 mentioned in the original posting.  I've 
> tried 2.6.10-rc2 with patch #1 reversed and patch 1+3 reversed.  No difference
> this time.

My understanding was that Wine would not have to be patched, but if the
latest -rc2 sources still show the regression maybe I'm wrong. Eric?