Re: [PATCH] include: Use fixed stack size for rbtree.

[Alexandre Julliard]

Henri Verbeet  writes:
> Could you give an example of how you're using this, and perhaps a
> reference to the relevant documentation? Either way, this would make
> struct wine_rb_tree a lot larger, and I don't think we want that.

While we probably don't want that in all cases, having the option of a
simpler, allocation-free rbtree would be nice. I suspect there are a
number of global lists that could benefit from that.