Re: Adding shmserver

[Dan Kegel]

Boris Reisig wrote:
> I saw previous posts about the shmserver solution. Its an excellent idea but
> will it be included in wine?
>
> http://www.transgaming.com/papers/shmserver.html

See
http://www.winehq.com/news/?view=154#Kernel%20Module%20/%20Shared%20Memory%2...
for a summary of past discussions.
In short: it's a little too Win9x-like in stability
for my taste.  I can understand people wanting it
for the short term, but long-term a kernel module is
the way to go.
- Dan