Re: [v5 1/3] evr: Add tests

[Alexandre Julliard]

Fabian Maurer  writes:
> > I don't think it's useful to have a test that doesn't test anything. You
> > should mark the tests as todo but still run them. If that's not
> > possible, it should wait until we have something to test.
>
> Yes, currently the tests give errors when run on wine. Policy is that we don't 
> add a test that fails, correct? Is it okay to add a test that fails inside the 
> todo block? Because that's counted as failure for some reason.

If it succeeds inside a todo then it's counted as failure. If it fails
as expected it's not counted.