James McKenzie skrev:
I'll agree that this is duplication of the existing X11 code, but the effect is more pleasant to the eye and leads to less user confusion, not to speak of a less expensive solution (I have yet to find a 'free' X11 client that is worth anything on Windows.)
You mean X server, not client? (Yes, it's confusing that the machine the user is at is called the server, but that's the way it is...)
So, just curious - what is wrong with the Cygwin X server (especially if you use its multi-window mode, which integrates nicely into your Windows desktop)?