Re: Winecfg -> browse for folder

[Robert van Herk]

Mike Hearn wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Nov 2004 10:37:10 +0100, Robert van Herk wrote:
> > Thus, if I'd make an extra flag in the dialog, I would have to extent 
> > pidls to, so that they can hold unix paths. Is that a wise thing to do? 
> > Or should I take another approach?
>
> Hmm, I'm not sure you want to do that. You may wish to abstract that out,
> eg replace the parts where PIDLs are passed around with a
>
> struct path
> {
>    PIDL pidl;
>    char *path;
> }

Ofcourse, but the api call SHBrowseForFolder returns a pidl. So making 
unix browsing an extra flag wouldn't be useful, if I couldn't return a 
valid pidl in the unix case.

Hmm, I guess perhaps it is best to make an extra api function for unix 
browsing anyway.

Robert