On Tue, 16 Jul 2002, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote: [...]
Personally I do not consider using explicit unicode strings such as 'f','o',o',0 as nasty workarounds. It's a quite acceptable approach.
'S','u','r','e',' ','i','t',''','s',' ','t','h','e',' ','o','n','l','y',' ','u','s','a','b','l','e',' ','a','p','p','r','o','a','c','h','.', 'B','u','t',' ','I',' ','s','t','i','l','l',' ','t','h','i','n','k',' ', 'w','r','i','t','i','n','g',' ','s','t','r','i','n','g','s',' ', 'l','i','k','e',' ','t','h','i','s',' ','i','s',' ', 'a','w','f','u','l','.', 'H','e','n','c','e',' ','t','h','e',' ','t','e','r','m',' ', 'k','l','u','d','g','e','.', ';','-',')'
-- Francois Gouget fgouget@free.fr http://fgouget.free.fr/ Any sufficiently advanced bug is indistinguishable from a feature. -- from some indian guy