Hi,
Personally, I think it would be better to use fcntl(F_NOTIFY), then fallback to FAM and finally no change notification. BSD can allways implement it natively too.
Put it this way: if we believe 90% of Wine users are using Linux, and %50 of users have FAM, then it would be logical to use F_NOTIFY instead of FAM, so that it works for most users with no effort on their half.
Mike
Ian Pilcher wrote:
That would be the plan. No FAM header at compile time, no change notification support (i.e. current behavior); can't load FAM library or connect to FAM daemon at runtime, no change notification support.