On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 5:27 PM Zhiyi Zhang zzhang@codeweavers.com wrote:
On 4/24/19 11:06 PM, Vijay Kiran Kamuju wrote:
Add todo_wine for failing tests
From: Vijay Kiran Kamuju infyquest@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Vijay Kiran Kamuju infyquest@gmail.com
dlls/advapi32/tests/security.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/dlls/advapi32/tests/security.c b/dlls/advapi32/tests/security.c index d9cae64da8b..7534e007915 100644 --- a/dlls/advapi32/tests/security.c +++ b/dlls/advapi32/tests/security.c @@ -1343,11 +1343,13 @@ static void test_AccessCheck(void)
if(pNtAccessCheck) {
DWORD ntPrivSetLen = sizeof(PRIVILEGE_SET);/* Generic access mask - no privilegeset buffer */ SetLastError(0xdeadbeef); Access = ntAccessStatus = 0x1abe11ed; ntret = pNtAccessCheck(SecurityDescriptor, Token, GENERIC_READ, &Mapping,
NULL, &PrivSetLen, &Access, &ntAccessStatus);
NULL, &ntPrivSetLen, &Access, &ntAccessStatus); err = GetLastError(); ok(ntret == STATUS_ACCESS_VIOLATION, "NtAccessCheck should have failed with STATUS_ACCESS_VIOLATION, got %x\n", ntret);@@ -1355,6 +1357,7 @@ static void test_AccessCheck(void) "NtAccessCheck shouldn't set last error, got %d\n", err); ok(Access == 0x1abe11ed && ntAccessStatus == 0x1abe11ed, "Access and/or AccessStatus were changed!\n");
ok(ntPrivSetLen == sizeof(PRIVILEGE_SET), "PrivSetLen returns %d\n", ntPrivSetLen); /* Generic access mask - no returnlength */ SetLastError(0xdeadbeef);@@ -1381,6 +1384,36 @@ static void test_AccessCheck(void) "NtAccessCheck shouldn't set last error, got %d\n", err); ok(Access == 0x1abe11ed && ntAccessStatus == 0x1abe11ed, "Access and/or AccessStatus were changed!\n");
/* Generic access mask - zero returnlength */SetLastError(0xdeadbeef);Access = ntAccessStatus = 0x1abe11ed;ntPrivSetLen = 0;Formating.
Will change the formating.
ntret = pNtAccessCheck(SecurityDescriptor, Token, GENERIC_READ, &Mapping,PrivSet, &ntPrivSetLen, &Access, &ntAccessStatus);err = GetLastError();ok(ntret == STATUS_GENERIC_NOT_MAPPED,"NtAccessCheck should have failed with STATUS_GENERIC_NOT_MAPPED, got %x\n", ntret);ok(err == 0xdeadbeef,"NtAccessCheck shouldn't set last error, got %d\n", err);ok(Access == 0x1abe11ed && ntAccessStatus == 0x1abe11ed,"Access and/or AccessStatus were changed!\n");todo_wine ok(ntPrivSetLen == 0, "PrivSetLen returns %d\n", ntPrivSetLen);/* Generic access mask - insufficient returnlength */SetLastError(0xdeadbeef);Access = ntAccessStatus = 0x1abe11ed;ntPrivSetLen = sizeof(PRIVILEGE_SET)-1;ntret = pNtAccessCheck(SecurityDescriptor, Token, GENERIC_READ, &Mapping,PrivSet, &ntPrivSetLen, &Access, &ntAccessStatus);err = GetLastError();ok(ntret == STATUS_GENERIC_NOT_MAPPED,This doesn't look right. You are testing the return length. Make sure other parameters are valid. This way we know the error is indeed from the invalid length.
It seems the test is getting STATUS_GENERIC_NOT_MAPPED because its GENERIC_READ, I will add another test for KEY_READ. That should help us understand the behavior further.
And I think we should move NtAccessCheck test into ntdll tests if it is not too much trouble.
I will move the tests once I try my tests on testbot.
"NtAccessCheck should have failed with STATUS_GENERIC_NOT_MAPPED, got %x\n", ntret);ok(err == 0xdeadbeef,"NtAccessCheck shouldn't set last error, got %d\n", err);ok(Access == 0x1abe11ed && ntAccessStatus == 0x1abe11ed,"Access and/or AccessStatus were changed!\n");todo_wine ok(ntPrivSetLen == sizeof(PRIVILEGE_SET)-1, "PrivSetLen returns %d\n", ntPrivSetLen);