On Thu, Dec 25, 2008 at 10:39 AM, Dmitry Timoshkov dmitry@codeweavers.com wrote:
"Austin English" austinenglish@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 8:50 PM, Vitaliy Margolen wine-devel@kievinfo.com wrote:
Austin English wrote:
In an effort to remove the CVS/GIT tag, I was going to go through and start changing the versions based on when the bug was filed. I.e., look at when 1.1.10 was out, and any bugs filed in those dates with CVS/GIT tag get moved to 1.1.10. I'm thinking of starting with 0.9, as anything before that is _really_ old and not worth the effort...
Agreed. Non need to generate huge volume of spam changing all the old versions. Especially for closed bugs.
Well, they all have to be moved so we can delete that version. I meant that anything that was before 0.9 will be labeled as 0.9.
I'd suggest to replace CVS/GIT tag in existing bugs buy "unknown" and ask the reporter to fix it (as I initially suggested when I proposed to get rid CVS/GIT tag).
-- Dmitry.
I was attempting to avoid more bugzilla e-mails to set the version, and considering that most people won't know the version that they were using that long ago, it's at most a futile effort.
Either way's fine with me, I'd just like to eliminate the version tag so we can quit getting 'CVS/GIT is deprecated e-mails'.