Re: ntdll: a simple implementation of cross-process NtAllocateVirtualMemory

[Dan Kegel]

On 6/2/06, Alexandre Julliard  wrote:
> > How about this: we combine the original sychronous approach
> > with the small preallocated cache as a fallback for when
> > no threads are waiting?
>
> You need to have a thread waiting one way or another, since you need
> to perform operations on the client side that require a thread
> context. No, it's not an easy problem to solve, that's why it has not
> been done yet...

Are you willing to accept a patch which makes some common use
cases work well, but does not address others?
If so, we can continue.  Otherwise we'll have to wash our hands
and walk away screaming.
- Dan