On 6/27/07, Evan Stade <estade at gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
[try2] The patch I sent yesterday was not properly todo_wined. Also, this test is a bit more extensive (about twice as many points drawn). It uses various point-type combination (even non-sensical ones such as PT_LINETO | PT_MOVETO) to test the exact logic of PolyDraw with an open path.
changelog:
- added polydraw test to path testing (5 more todo_wines)
dlls/gdi32/tests/path.c | 70 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
-- Evan Stade
Also, the attached (much shorter) diff makes all your tests conform on wine for me. I am a little confused as to where the non-open-path part of your PolyDraw patch came from (maybe I am missing something).
Misha