We now have about 100 bugs nominated for fixing in 1.0. Thanks to everybody who nominated bugs.
Now it's time to winnow the list a bit. 1.0 bugs should be 'important' somehow, easy to reproduce, and have some chance of actually being fixed by, say, summer. The better understood a bug is, the more likely it is it can be fixed for 1.0, so even less important bugs can be 1.0 bugs if they're well enough understood and a patch is available.
Here are a few bugs I'm thinking of deferring, and why:
Not important enough http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5807 Mercora IMRadio crashes http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6048 Stokes crashes http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8687 everestpoker and Programmer's Editor don't work http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9288 Armed Assault doesn't load web page http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9895 Alzip crashes
Probably not doable by summer http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=609 Add BiDi support
Not well enough understood: http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6383 Dual-core not being correctly supported
Do people agree with those assessments, and are there other bugs nominated for 1.0 that don't quite deserve it? - Dan
-
Dan Kegel