Re: [v5 02/12] reg.exe: Add REG_EXPAND_SZ tests for reg add

[Stefan Dösinger]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Am 2014-10-17 20:38, schrieb Jonathan Vollebregt:
> - /* REG_EXPAND_SZ */
> - run_reg_exe("reg add HKCU\" KEY_BASE " /v expand0 /t REG_EXpand_sz /d "dead%PATH%beef" /f", &r);
> - ok(r == REG_EXIT_SUCCESS, "got exit code %d, expected 0\n", r);
> - verify_reg(hkey, "expand0", REG_EXPAND_SZ, "dead%PATH%beef", 15, TODO_REG_SIZE);

Is there really no observable difference between REG_SZ and REG_EXPAND_SZ? The MSDN description suggests that the behavior you observe here is correct, but I wonder what REG_EXPAND_SZ is good for in this case, other than just an elaborate way to set a flag that says "please call ExpandEnvironmentStrings".
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=7z6c
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----