Can someone please check the MS headers for the RECT definition?
In our definition, we use INT, while the MinGW people use LONG. Which one is correct?
Ours:
typedef struct tagRECT { INT left; INT top; INT right; INT bottom; } RECT, *PRECT, *LPRECT;
MinGW:
typedef struct tagRECT { LONG left; LONG top; LONG right; LONG bottom; } RECT,*PRECT,*LPRECT;
Dimitrie O. Paun a écrit:
Can someone please check the MS headers for the RECT definition?
In our definition, we use INT, while the MinGW people use LONG. Which one is correct?
LONG
Vincent