On 03/03/2010 03:18 AM, Nikolay Sivov wrote:
This call is used by open file function of IE7.
Some added tests crash on W2K and below. I already sent a patch for that (http://source.winehq.org/patches/data/58988).
There are however also failures introduced on Vista+:
http://test.winehq.org/data/tests/shell32:shlfolder.html
Could you have a look?
I'm a bit reluctant to say this again but running these tests on winetestbot would have shown these problems immediately.
On 4 March 2010 07:55, Paul Vriens paul.vriens.wine@gmail.com wrote:
On 03/03/2010 03:18 AM, Nikolay Sivov wrote:
This call is used by open file function of IE7.
Some added tests crash on W2K and below. I already sent a patch for that (http://source.winehq.org/patches/data/58988).
There are however also failures introduced on Vista+:
http://test.winehq.org/data/tests/shell32:shlfolder.html
Could you have a look?
I'm a bit reluctant to say this again but running these tests on winetestbot would have shown these problems immediately.
If patch watcher is available, it could be taught to send patches to winetestbot (winetestbot would need to be taught about patch series and how to correctly apply/test them).
This would help pick out these issues earlier.
Oh and btw: winetestbot is awesome! Thanks to Greg for setting it up.
Thanks, - Reece
On 03/04/2010 09:12 AM, Reece Dunn wrote:
On 4 March 2010 07:55, Paul Vrienspaul.vriens.wine@gmail.com wrote:
On 03/03/2010 03:18 AM, Nikolay Sivov wrote:
This call is used by open file function of IE7.
Some added tests crash on W2K and below. I already sent a patch for that (http://source.winehq.org/patches/data/58988).
There are however also failures introduced on Vista+:
http://test.winehq.org/data/tests/shell32:shlfolder.html
Could you have a look?
I'm a bit reluctant to say this again but running these tests on winetestbot would have shown these problems immediately.
If patch watcher is available, it could be taught to send patches to winetestbot (winetestbot would need to be taught about patch series and how to correctly apply/test them).
That's already planned for (see http://wiki.winehq.org/WineTestBot) and I think Ge actually wanted to integrate (some sort of) patchwatcher based on Dan's.
This would help pick out these issues earlier.
The idea behind winetestbot was to have developers check their new/changed tests before submitting. Lots of people already use winetestbot (even the master himself) but it would be nice if people would add it to their workflow.
Oh and btw: winetestbot is awesome! Thanks to Greg for setting it up.
I second that (again ;) ).
Thanks,
- Reece
On 3/4/2010 10:55, Paul Vriens wrote:
On 03/03/2010 03:18 AM, Nikolay Sivov wrote:
This call is used by open file function of IE7.
Some added tests crash on W2K and below. I already sent a patch for that (http://source.winehq.org/patches/data/58988).
There are however also failures introduced on Vista+:
http://test.winehq.org/data/tests/shell32:shlfolder.html
Could you have a look?
Ok, I'll start with it today. Vista retvalue is trivial, but failing main test needs time.
I'm a bit reluctant to say this again but running these tests on winetestbot would have shown these problems immediately.
You're right, I should use it more often.