On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 12:18:23PM +0400, Vitaly Lipatov wrote:
I think the more appropriate place for a missed libc function is libs/port.
If it is ever needed by another dll, then it can get moved there.
Huw.
Huw Davies писал 2014-04-08 12:30:
On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 12:18:23PM +0400, Vitaly Lipatov wrote:
I think the more appropriate place for a missed libc function is libs/port.
If it is ever needed by another dll, then it can get moved there.
I guess we use libs/port not for common used code, but for system depended code. It allows us make the code more portable. From my view, it is better do not place system related code in a dll at all. That code placed in ntdll. But it is NT dll, not Android dll. Just IMHO.