From: Kevin Puetz PuetzKevinA@JohnDeere.com
Signed-off-by: Jacek Caban jacek@codeweavers.com --- dlls/oleaut32/typelib.c | 15 ++++----------- include/oleauto.h | 2 +- 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
Hi,
While running your changed tests, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at: https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=56933
Your paranoid android.
=== debian10 (32 bit report) ===
oleaut32: Unhandled exception: divide by zero in 32-bit code (0x7e8ef421).
Report errors: oleaut32:olepicture crashed (c0000094)
=== debian10 (32 bit Chinese:China report) ===
oleaut32: Unhandled exception: divide by zero in 32-bit code (0x7eb69421).
Report errors: oleaut32:olepicture crashed (c0000094)
=== debian10 (32 bit WoW report) ===
oleaut32: Unhandled exception: divide by zero in 32-bit code (0x7e8ef421).
Report errors: oleaut32:olepicture crashed (c0000094)
=== debian10 (64 bit WoW report) ===
oleaut32: Unhandled exception: divide by zero in 32-bit code (0x7e8ef421).
Report errors: oleaut32:olepicture crashed (c0000094)
Out of curiosity, what was the problem with the prototype? Shouldn't it be the same as the actual function?
Regards, Fabian Maurer
On 9/25/19 9:51 PM, Fabian Maurer wrote:
Out of curiosity, what was the problem with the prototype? Shouldn't it be the same as the actual function?
It used WCHAR* instead of const WCHAR*. With the patch, the prototype is the same as the implementation.
Jacek