ALLUSERSPROFILE Patch

[Austin English]

While looking at bug 7292
(http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7292) I wrote a patch to
implement ALLUSERSPROFILE. I looked on MSDN/Google for the dirid for
this shell folder, but can only find dirids for it's subdirectories.
For example:
16406 	All Users\Start Menu
16407 	All Users\Start Menu\Programs
16408 	All Users\Start Menu\Programs\Startup
16409 	All Users\Desktop
16415 	All Users\Favorites
16419 	All Users\Application Data

Looking for an opinion on which would be better, to map ALLUSERSPROFILE to
%10%\profiles\All Users
(This is how my current patch does it)

Or I could continue looking for the windows implementation of it,
which so far hasn't proven very fruitful.

Patch is attached.

[Vitaliy Margolen]

I wonder how is this different from: 
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2007-May/038805.html

And what AJ replied to it:
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2007-May/056555.html

Vitaliy.

Austin English wrote:
> While looking at bug 7292
> (http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7292) I wrote a patch to
> implement ALLUSERSPROFILE. I looked on MSDN/Google for the dirid for
> this shell folder, but can only find dirids for it's subdirectories.
> For example:
> 16406 	All Users\Start Menu
> 16407 	All Users\Start Menu\Programs
> 16408 	All Users\Start Menu\Programs\Startup
> 16409 	All Users\Desktop
> 16415 	All Users\Favorites
> 16419 	All Users\Application Data
>
> Looking for an opinion on which would be better, to map ALLUSERSPROFILE to
> %10%\profiles\All Users
> (This is how my current patch does it)
>
> Or I could continue looking for the windows implementation of it,
> which so far hasn't proven very fruitful.
>
> Patch is attached.