The ws2_32:sock fails on some of my machines with the following error:
sock.c:4794: Test failed: Local socket address is different 0.1.0.0 != 127.0.0.1
Does anyone know why we GetAcceptExSockaddrs() would return 0.1.0.0 instead of 127.0.0.1? Looking at the Windows 7 winetest results it does not appear to be correlated with either the SP1 or IE9.
For instance got an error on Windows 7 + SP1 + IE9 (32 and 64-bit): http://test.winehq.org/data/b233d2054e64e216a5b3868f301bfc934b019b4b/win7_fg... http://test.winehq.org/data/b233d2054e64e216a5b3868f301bfc934b019b4b/win7_fg...
But not here (Windows 7 + SP1 + IE9 64-bit): http://test.winehq.org/data/83846cd131aac33228bf08aefae0bf0ea93d4273/win7_fg...
I also got it failing at least once on a Windows 2000 SP4 VM: http://test.winehq.org/data/b233d2054e64e216a5b3868f301bfc934b019b4b/2000_fg...
But never saw it fail on my Windows XP or 2003 VMs.
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 4:11 PM, Francois Gouget fgouget@codeweavers.com wrote:
The ws2_32:sock fails on some of my machines with the following error:
sock.c:4794: Test failed: Local socket address is different 0.1.0.0 != 127.0.0.1
Does anyone know why we GetAcceptExSockaddrs() would return 0.1.0.0 instead of 127.0.0.1? Looking at the Windows 7 winetest results it does not appear to be correlated with either the SP1 or IE9.
For instance got an error on Windows 7 + SP1 + IE9 (32 and 64-bit): http://test.winehq.org/data/b233d2054e64e216a5b3868f301bfc934b019b4b/win7_fg... http://test.winehq.org/data/b233d2054e64e216a5b3868f301bfc934b019b4b/win7_fg...
But not here (Windows 7 + SP1 + IE9 64-bit): http://test.winehq.org/data/83846cd131aac33228bf08aefae0bf0ea93d4273/win7_fg...
I also got it failing at least once on a Windows 2000 SP4 VM: http://test.winehq.org/data/b233d2054e64e216a5b3868f301bfc934b019b4b/2000_fg...
But never saw it fail on my Windows XP or 2003 VMs.
I don't know the answer yet, I'll add a more verbose debug of the struct, add Set/GetLastError and check the returned pointers. I have a win7 machine that does not reproduce the issue, so I'll try installing SP1 + IE9 hoping to break things and expose the test failure.
-- Francois Gouget fgouget@codeweavers.com
Best wishes, Bruno
-
Bruno Jesus -
Francois Gouget