Re: server: Add a call for retrieving the image file name of a process.

[Alexandre Julliard]

Robert Shearman  writes:
> dlls/ntdll/process.c    |   20 +++++++++++++++++++-
>  dlls/ntdll/tests/info.c |   36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  server/process.c        |   31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  server/protocol.def     |    9 +++++++++
>  4 files changed, 95 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

You should use the existing get_dll_info request for that.

server: Add a call for retrieving the image file name of a process.

[Robert Shearman]

Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Robert Shearman  writes:
> > dlls/ntdll/process.c    |   20 +++++++++++++++++++-
> >  dlls/ntdll/tests/info.c |   36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  server/process.c        |   31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  server/protocol.def     |    9 +++++++++
> >  4 files changed, 95 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> You should use the existing get_dll_info request for that.

get_dll_info doesn't appear to be suitable for this purpose. We don't 
know what the base address of the EXE is and the call doesn't return the 
required size for the filename.

server: Add a call for retrieving the image file name of a process.

[Alexandre Julliard]

Robert Shearman  writes:
> get_dll_info doesn't appear to be suitable for this purpose. We don't
> know what the base address of the EXE is and the call doesn't return
> the required size for the filename.

Well, you have to extend it a bit to support that, but it's better than
adding a new request.