Hi
I think this patch is not correct.
-#define LongToHandle(h) ((HANDLE)(LONG_PTR)(h)) +#define LongToHandle(h) ((HANDLE)(LONG_PTR)(l))
I dont see 'l' defined or sent to this macro any where.
Thanks, VJ
"Vijay Kiran Kamuju" infyquest@gmail.com wrote:
I think this patch is not correct.
-#define LongToHandle(h) ((HANDLE)(LONG_PTR)(h)) +#define LongToHandle(h) ((HANDLE)(LONG_PTR)(l))
I dont see 'l' defined or sent to this macro any where.
If you will inspect more closely all appropriate macros you will notice why it's a typo.
On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 05:04:39PM +0900, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
"Vijay Kiran Kamuju" infyquest@gmail.com wrote:
I think this patch is not correct.
-#define LongToHandle(h) ((HANDLE)(LONG_PTR)(h)) +#define LongToHandle(h) ((HANDLE)(LONG_PTR)(l))
I dont see 'l' defined or sent to this macro any where.
If you will inspect more closely all appropriate macros you will notice why it's a typo.
Well, I meant more that you should have changed "h" in both occurences, instead of just one.
Like this:
-#define LongToHandle(h) ((HANDLE)(LONG_PTR)(h)) +#define LongToHandle(l) ((HANDLE)(LONG_PTR)(l))
Ciao, Marcus