Re: [PATCH 2/2] comctl32: Correct values passed in MCN_SELECT/MCN_SELCHANGE notifications.

[Marvin]

Hi,

While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=20934

Your paranoid android.

=== WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit monthcal) ===
monthcal.c:1257: Test failed: monthcal hit test: the msg 0x000f was expected, but got msg 0x1001 instead

=== W2KPROSP4 (32 bit monthcal) ===
monthcal.c:1257: Test failed: monthcal hit test: the msg 0x000f was expected, but got msg 0x1001 instead

=== WXPPROSP3 (32 bit monthcal) ===
monthcal.c:1257: Test failed: monthcal hit test: the msg 0x000f was expected, but got msg 0x1001 instead

=== W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit monthcal) ===
monthcal.c:1257: Test failed: monthcal hit test: the msg 0x000f was expected, but got msg 0x1001 instead

=== WVISTAADM (32 bit monthcal) ===
monthcal.c:1257: Test failed: monthcal hit test: the msg 0x000f was expected, but got msg 0x1001 instead

=== W2K8SE (32 bit monthcal) ===
monthcal.c:1257: Test failed: monthcal hit test: the msg 0x000f was expected, but got msg 0x1001 instead

=== W7PRO (32 bit monthcal) ===
monthcal.c:1257: Test failed: monthcal hit test: the msg 0x000f was expected, but got msg 0x1001 instead

=== W7PROX64 (32 bit monthcal) ===
monthcal.c:1257: Test failed: monthcal hit test: the msg 0x000f was expected, but got msg 0x1001 instead

=== TEST64_W7SP1 (32 bit monthcal) ===
monthcal.c:1257: Test failed: monthcal hit test: the msg 0x000f was expected, but got msg 0x1001 instead

=== W7PROX64 (64 bit monthcal) ===
monthcal.c:1257: Test failed: monthcal hit test: the msg 0x000f was expected, but got msg 0x1001 instead

=== TEST64_W7SP1 (64 bit monthcal) ===
monthcal.c:1257: Test failed: monthcal hit test: the msg 0x000f was expected, but got msg 0x1001 instead