Re: Named Pipe patch

[Tony Lambregts]

Mike McCormack wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This patch probably shouldn't be applied... it's just to let everybody 
> know where I'm at with the named pipes code.
>
> The patch moves away from using unix pipes to implement named pipes, 
> and instead implements pipes internally. This is necessary to 
> implement message mode properly (without race conditions).
>
> I don't have time to work on it this week, so don't expect anything 
> new before the weekend. If anybody wants to play with it or comment, 
> feel welcome.
>
> I've started trying to pass some of Dan's tests, but it still fails... 
> Dan, your test's coverage is great!
>
> Mike

<patch police>
cvs diff -u
</patch police>