Hi, I am just wondering how much does the wine source located on http://ftp.codeweavers.com/pub/crossover/office/source/office-src-4.1.0.tgz differ from 20040716. I guess its codeweavers internal patched version, I see changes in there dating to January. Are there any restrictions on using this source?
Short answer - RTFM
Grant Williamson wrote:
Hi, I am just wondering how much does the wine source located on http://ftp.codeweavers.com/pub/crossover/office/source/office-src-4.1.0.tgz differ from 20040716.
RTFM diff -r
I guess its codeweavers internal patched version, I see changes in there dating to January. Are there any restrictions on using this source?
Read the license.
This source is under the license attached to it. Most (if not all) of it should be LGPL.
Shachar
Grant Williamson wrote:
I am just wondering how much does the wine source located on http://ftp.codeweavers.com/pub/crossover/office/source/office-src-4.1.0.tgz differ from 20040716. I guess its codeweavers internal patched version, I see changes in there dating to January. Are there any restrictions on using this source?
That is the LGPL'ed source code of the Wine tree in use in CrossOver 4.1. You can checkout the Wine tree of 20040716 and do a diff -ur on it if you want to see the differences.
It can be compiled into the same binaries as used in CrossOver, but only if you use the same compiler, headers and libraries as we use.
Mike
Mike McCormack wrote:
It can be compiled into the same binaries as used in CrossOver, but only if you use the same compiler, headers and libraries as we use.
Or close enough to it. It's been done before. http://lingnu.com/support.html
Shachar