Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=12560
Your paranoid android.
=== w2000pro (32 bit) === No test summary line found
=== wxppro (32 bit) === No test summary line found
=== w2003std (32 bit) === No test summary line found
=== wvistau64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found
=== w2008s64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found
=== w7u (32 bit) === No test summary line found
=== w8 (32 bit) === No test summary line found
=== wvistau64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found
=== w2008s64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found
testbot: https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=12562
Hi all, is there anything to do to improve this patch? Thanks in advance.
2015-04-01 12:21 GMT+08:00 Marvin testbot@winehq.org:
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=12560
Your paranoid android.
=== w2000pro (32 bit) === No test summary line found
=== wxppro (32 bit) === No test summary line found
=== w2003std (32 bit) === No test summary line found
=== wvistau64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found
=== w2008s64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found
=== w7u (32 bit) === No test summary line found
=== w8 (32 bit) === No test summary line found
=== wvistau64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found
=== w2008s64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found
On 04/01/15 08:17, Shuai Meng wrote:
Hi all, is there anything to do to improve this patch?
The patch looks good for me.
Thanks, Piotr