Re: [PATCH 2/2] d3dx9: Test penultimate declaration element in D3DXDeclaratorFromFVFTest.

[James McKenzie]

Misha Koshelev wrote:
> dlls/d3dx9_36/tests/mesh.c |    6 +++---
>  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/dlls/d3dx9_36/tests/mesh.c b/dlls/d3dx9_36/tests/mesh.c
> index a2fb6d8..2952e23 100644
> --- a/dlls/d3dx9_36/tests/mesh.c
> +++ b/dlls/d3dx9_36/tests/mesh.c
> @@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ static void D3DXDeclaratorFromFVFTest(void)
>      if (hr == D3D_OK)
>      {
> -
>        for (i=0; i<4; i++)
> -
>        for (i=0; i<5; i++)

I don't know about everyone else here, but I prefer to use less than or 
equal to, which I think is what was intended here.   This positively 
states the upper bound, which is what I was taught in programming 
classes a long time ago (when ANSI C was still 89...)

Thus this would be

for (i=0; i<=4; i++)

James McKenzie

[PATCH 2/2] d3dx9: Test penultimate declaration element in D3DXDeclaratorFromFVFTest.

[Alexandre Julliard]

James McKenzie  writes:
> Misha Koshelev wrote:
> > dlls/d3dx9_36/tests/mesh.c |    6 +++---
> >  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/dlls/d3dx9_36/tests/mesh.c b/dlls/d3dx9_36/tests/mesh.c
> > index a2fb6d8..2952e23 100644
> > --- a/dlls/d3dx9_36/tests/mesh.c
> > +++ b/dlls/d3dx9_36/tests/mesh.c
> > @@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ static void D3DXDeclaratorFromFVFTest(void)
> >           if (hr == D3D_OK)
> >          {
> > -
> >        for (i=0; i<4; i++)
> > -
> >        for (i=0; i<5; i++)
>
> I don't know about everyone else here, but I prefer to use less than
> or equal to, which I think is what was intended here.   This
> positively states the upper bound, which is what I was taught in
> programming classes a long time ago (when ANSI C was still 89...)
>
> Thus this would be
>
> for (i=0; i<=4; i++)

There's no reason that this would be any better. Please don't give
advice based on folklore you heard in programming classes.