On 2013-11-19 18:03, Zhenbo Li wrote:
"Expected 0x402 or ERROR_FILE_NOT_FOUND, got %d\n", retval);
You should probably change the %d to %x, too.
On the other hand, I don't see any need for your patch whatsoever. Maybe you should explain yourself.
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Lauri Kenttä lauri.kentta@gmail.com wrote:
On 2013-11-19 18:03, Zhenbo Li wrote:
"Expected 0x402 or ERROR_FILE_NOT_FOUND, got %d\n", retval);
You should probably change the %d to %x, too.
On the other hand, I don't see any need for your patch whatsoever. Maybe you should explain yourself.
Nikolay asked him: http://wine.1045685.n5.nabble.com/Re-shell32-tests-delete-a-nonexistent-file...
-- Lauri Kenttä
Bruno
Bruno Jesus 00cpxxx@gmail.com writes:
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Lauri Kenttä lauri.kentta@gmail.com wrote:
On 2013-11-19 18:03, Zhenbo Li wrote:
"Expected 0x402 or ERROR_FILE_NOT_FOUND, got %d\n", retval);
You should probably change the %d to %x, too.
On the other hand, I don't see any need for your patch whatsoever. Maybe you should explain yourself.
Nikolay asked him: http://wine.1045685.n5.nabble.com/Re-shell32-tests-delete-a-nonexistent-file...
Actually for Win32 error codes, decimal is preferable, that's how they are listed in winerror.h.
On 11/19/2013 22:11, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Bruno Jesus 00cpxxx@gmail.com writes:
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Lauri Kenttä lauri.kentta@gmail.com wrote:
On 2013-11-19 18:03, Zhenbo Li wrote:
"Expected 0x402 or ERROR_FILE_NOT_FOUND, got %d\n", retval);
You should probably change the %d to %x, too.
On the other hand, I don't see any need for your patch whatsoever. Maybe you should explain yourself.
Nikolay asked him: http://wine.1045685.n5.nabble.com/Re-shell32-tests-delete-a-nonexistent-file...
Actually for Win32 error codes, decimal is preferable, that's how they are listed in winerror.h.
That was a special one, 0x402 is listed on msdn page only as 'unknown error', it's not a part of winerror.h, at least not in a recent versions. Anyway I don't think it makes sense to have a separate patch for that, I only mentioned it as one possible change to newly added tests. Of course it's not important to begin with.