2014-11-17 9:37 GMT+01:00 Sebastian Lackner sebastian@fds-team.de:
Someone asked me to submit this, although its very Ubuntu specific.
On some Ubuntu versions there only exists a package where libgnutls was renamed to libgnutls-deb0. As an effect ./configure fails to detect it properly because it compares the exact soname.
http://packages.ubuntu.com/precise/amd64/libgnutls28/filelist http://packages.ubuntu.com/utopic/amd64/libgnutls-deb0-28/filelist
configure.ac | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Hi Sebastian,
This also fixes libgnutls detection on Debian testing (and futur Jessie) and derivatives.
What about [[libgnutls\(-deb[[0-9]]\)\{0,1\}]] or [[libgnutls\(-[[0-9A-Za-z]]+\)\{0,1\}]] instead. I don't think the debian specific soname will bump too often but it could avoid the need for another patch.
On 18.11.2014 07:52, Nicolas Le Cam wrote:
2014-11-17 9:37 GMT+01:00 Sebastian Lackner sebastian@fds-team.de:
Someone asked me to submit this, although its very Ubuntu specific.
On some Ubuntu versions there only exists a package where libgnutls was renamed to libgnutls-deb0. As an effect ./configure fails to detect it properly because it compares the exact soname.
http://packages.ubuntu.com/precise/amd64/libgnutls28/filelist http://packages.ubuntu.com/utopic/amd64/libgnutls-deb0-28/filelist
configure.ac | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Hi Sebastian,
This also fixes libgnutls detection on Debian testing (and futur Jessie) and derivatives.
What about [[libgnutls\(-deb[[0-9]]\)\{0,1\}]] or [[libgnutls\(-[[0-9A-Za-z]]+\)\{0,1\}]] instead. I don't think the debian specific soname will bump too often but it could avoid the need for another patch.
The second idea would also match libgnutls-openssl. Not sure if that hurts, but so far this check only matches 'real' gnutls, and not the openssl wrapper lib.
-
Nicolas Le Cam -
Sebastian Lackner