[PATCH] [bugzilla] update 2.0 references to 4.0.

[Alexandre Julliard]

Austin English  writes:
> From 602cb127e4dc31d4450f81b9b744d50e541e4809 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Austin English 
> Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2018 17:38:31 -0600
> Subject: [PATCH] [bugzilla] update 2.0 references to 4.0.

These milestones have never seen much use, and now with time-based
releases I'm not sure they even make sense anymore.

[Austin English]

On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 3:54 PM, Alexandre Julliard  wrote:
> Austin English  writes:
> > From 602cb127e4dc31d4450f81b9b744d50e541e4809 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Austin English 
> > Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2018 17:38:31 -0600
> > Subject: [PATCH] [bugzilla] update 2.0 references to 4.0.
>
> These milestones have never seen much use, and now with time-based
> releases I'm not sure they even make sense anymore.
>
> --
> Alexandre Julliard
> [e-mail]

Should I take that to mean we should kill the link then? Do you want
me to send a patch or will you?

[Alexandre Julliard]

Austin English  writes:
> On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 3:54 PM, Alexandre Julliard  wrote:
> > Austin English  writes:
> > > From 602cb127e4dc31d4450f81b9b744d50e541e4809 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > > From: Austin English 
> > > Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2018 17:38:31 -0600
> > > Subject: [PATCH] [bugzilla] update 2.0 references to 4.0.
> >
> > These milestones have never seen much use, and now with time-based
> > releases I'm not sure they even make sense anymore.
> >
> > --
> > Alexandre Julliard
> > [e-mail]
>
> Should I take that to mean we should kill the link then? Do you want
> me to send a patch or will you?

I think we can remove it, if there are no objections. If you could send
a patch that would be great.