Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com writes:
From 602cb127e4dc31d4450f81b9b744d50e541e4809 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2018 17:38:31 -0600 Subject: [PATCH] [bugzilla] update 2.0 references to 4.0.
These milestones have never seen much use, and now with time-based releases I'm not sure they even make sense anymore.
On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 3:54 PM, Alexandre Julliard julliard@winehq.org wrote:
Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com writes:
From 602cb127e4dc31d4450f81b9b744d50e541e4809 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2018 17:38:31 -0600 Subject: [PATCH] [bugzilla] update 2.0 references to 4.0.
These milestones have never seen much use, and now with time-based releases I'm not sure they even make sense anymore.
-- Alexandre Julliard julliard@winehq.org
Should I take that to mean we should kill the link then? Do you want me to send a patch or will you?
Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com writes:
On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 3:54 PM, Alexandre Julliard julliard@winehq.org wrote:
Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com writes:
From 602cb127e4dc31d4450f81b9b744d50e541e4809 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2018 17:38:31 -0600 Subject: [PATCH] [bugzilla] update 2.0 references to 4.0.
These milestones have never seen much use, and now with time-based releases I'm not sure they even make sense anymore.
-- Alexandre Julliard julliard@winehq.org
Should I take that to mean we should kill the link then? Do you want me to send a patch or will you?
I think we can remove it, if there are no objections. If you could send a patch that would be great.