My workstation was failing a test because it didn't have a 640x480 display mode. Turned out it was how the dual monitor support was configured, and changing a line in /etc/X11/xorg.conf from Option "MetaModes" "2560x1600,2560x1600; 1920x1200,1920x1200; 1600x1200,1600x1200; 1280x1024,1280x1024" to Option "MetaModes" "2560x1600,2560x1600; 1920x1200,1920x1200; 1600x1200,1600x1200; 1280x1024,1280x1024; 640x480,NULL" made the test happy.
Probably not worth worrying about changing the test to expect crazy configurations like this...
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 10:33 AM, Dan Kegel dank@kegel.com wrote:
My workstation was failing a test because it didn't have a 640x480 display mode. Turned out it was how the dual monitor support was configured, and changing a line in /etc/X11/xorg.conf ... made the test happy.
Probably not worth worrying about changing the test to expect crazy configurations like this...
On second thought, http://test.winehq.org/data/3c1c6172779510a7ed693d922fb3061948999ea1/#group_... shows three windows systems that make me wonder whether there are windows systems in the wild which don't have a 640x480 mode... maybe we should make that test output the list of valid modes...