Patrik Stridvall [email protected] writes:
All of the forms:
(1) void WINAPI (*foo)(void); (2) void (* WINAPI foo)(void); (3) void (WINAPI *foo)(void);
Seems to work with gcc. Even with gcc 2.7.x.
I believe the problems were rather with g++. In my 2.95.4 version, case (2) still doesn't work (well it compiles but generates wrong code). Case (3) works though, so that sounds like the way to go, I'll apply your patch.
On 31 Jan 2002, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Patrik Stridvall [email protected] writes:
All of the forms:
(1) void WINAPI (*foo)(void); (2) void (* WINAPI foo)(void); (3) void (WINAPI *foo)(void);
Seems to work with gcc. Even with gcc 2.7.x.
I believe the problems were rather with g++. In my 2.95.4 version, case (2) still doesn't work (well it compiles but generates wrong code). Case (3) works though, so that sounds like the way to go, I'll apply your patch.
Yes, g++ is the culprit here. IIRC I did some changes about one year ago because of g++ (maybe going to 1 or 2). But in any case I would consider it a bug with g++, hopefully they will fix it (either in 2.95.5 or 3.0.x).
-- Francois Gouget [email protected] http://fgouget.free.fr/ Avoid the Gates of Hell - use Linux.
-
Alexandre Julliard -
Francois Gouget