Re: Resend: Implements languagegroups functions

[Alexandre Julliard]

Maxime Bellengé  writes:
> This patch implements the languagegroups functions.
> As I have access to a French and English windows 2k+, I set 
> the resources accordingly for the kernel32 resources. However, as
> I don't know the resources for other languages, I have put English
> resources in the other nls files. People will have to change them to the
> correct values.

You should really implement the A functions by calling the W ones
instead of duplicating the code. Also I'm not sure there's much point
in looking up the info in the registry, we don't support installing
locales dynamically anyway so we might as well have a static table in
the code.

Resend: Implements languagegroups functions

[Maxime Bellengé]

On Tue, 2003-04-08 at 20:03, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Maxime Bellengé  writes:
> > This patch implements the languagegroups functions.
> > As I have access to a French and English windows 2k+, I set 
> > the resources accordingly for the kernel32 resources. However, as
> > I don't know the resources for other languages, I have put English
> > resources in the other nls files. People will have to change them to the
> > correct values.
>
> You should really implement the A functions by calling the W ones
> instead of duplicating the code. Also I'm not sure there's much point
> in looking up the info in the registry, we don't support installing
> locales dynamically anyway so we might as well have a static table in
> the code.

I thought of doing that however EnumSystemLanguageA calls a callback
function with a LPTSTR string parameter and the W one calls the callback
with a LPWSTR.

So if the A function calls the W function , the W one will always calls
the callback function with a LPWSTR and that's not what
EnumSystemLanguageA expects.

Anyone can give me an advice on how to do that ?

For the resources, I will move them in a table as you advice me.

a+

Max

Resend: Implements languagegroups functions

[Alexandre Julliard]

Maxime Bellengé  writes:
> So if the A function calls the W function , the W one will always calls
> the callback function with a LPWSTR and that's not what
> EnumSystemLanguageA expects.
>
> Anyone can give me an advice on how to do that ?

The A function can use a callback wrapper that translates the string
and then calls the real A callback. We are doing this kind of stuff a
lot in the 16-bit code, to implement 16-bit Enum functions on top of
the 32-bit ones.