Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=22897
Your paranoid android.
=== WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit webbrowser) === webbrowser.c:3289: Test failed: Creating WebBrowser object failed: 80040154 webbrowser.c:3289: Test failed: Creating WebBrowser object failed: 80040154 webbrowser.c:3289: Test failed: Creating WebBrowser object failed: 80040154 webbrowser.c:3428: Test failed: Creating WebBrowser object failed: 80040154 webbrowser: unhandled exception c0000005 at 0040810F
=== W2KPROSP4 (32 bit webbrowser) === webbrowser.c:2596: Test failed: expected GetOverridesKeyPath webbrowser.c:2601: Test failed: expected Invoke_SETSECURELOCKICON webbrowser.c:2602: Test failed: expected Invoke_FILEDOWNLOAD webbrowser.c:3015: Test failed: doc_disp == NULL webbrowser: unhandled exception c0000005 at 00402F21
On 11/12/12 13:21, Marvin wrote:
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=22897
Your paranoid android.
=== WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit webbrowser) === webbrowser.c:3289: Test failed: Creating WebBrowser object failed: 80040154 webbrowser.c:3289: Test failed: Creating WebBrowser object failed: 80040154 webbrowser.c:3289: Test failed: Creating WebBrowser object failed: 80040154 webbrowser.c:3428: Test failed: Creating WebBrowser object failed: 80040154 webbrowser: unhandled exception c0000005 at 0040810F
=== W2KPROSP4 (32 bit webbrowser) === webbrowser.c:2596: Test failed: expected GetOverridesKeyPath webbrowser.c:2601: Test failed: expected Invoke_SETSECURELOCKICON webbrowser.c:2602: Test failed: expected Invoke_FILEDOWNLOAD webbrowser.c:3015: Test failed: doc_disp == NULL webbrowser: unhandled exception c0000005 at 00402F21
That's TestBot not skipping on platforms that should be skipped.
Jacek
On Mon, 12 Nov 2012, Jacek Caban wrote:
On 11/12/12 13:21, Marvin wrote:
[...]
=== W2KPROSP4 (32 bit webbrowser) === webbrowser.c:2596: Test failed: expected GetOverridesKeyPath webbrowser.c:2601: Test failed: expected Invoke_SETSECURELOCKICON webbrowser.c:2602: Test failed: expected Invoke_FILEDOWNLOAD webbrowser.c:3015: Test failed: doc_disp == NULL webbrowser: unhandled exception c0000005 at 00402F21
That's TestBot not skipping on platforms that should be skipped.
We can potentially change the criteria that TestBot uses to decide whether to skip. But what should these be here? Also, do they really belong in WineTestBot, which would likely require duplicating that code to WineTest too, or should the skipping really be done by the test itself?
Francois Gouget fgouget@codeweavers.com writes:
We can potentially change the criteria that TestBot uses to decide whether to skip. But what should these be here? Also, do they really belong in WineTestBot, which would likely require duplicating that code to WineTest too, or should the skipping really be done by the test itself?
That code is already in winetest, that's the point. Testbot should be skipping the exact same things that winetest already skips.
Conceivably we could use winetest to run tests on the testbot to avoid duplicating the logic.