Mike McCormack wrote:
ChangeLog: aric@codeweavers.com
- free allocated buffers
The other daty I saw a lot of patches changing things like if (buffer) HeapFree(GetProcessHeap(),0,buffer); To HeapFree(GetProcessHeap(),0,buffer);
Why are you adding new code with the if() statement in place again?
Just curious
regards,
Joris
Joris Huizer wrote:
The other daty I saw a lot of patches changing things like if (buffer) HeapFree(GetProcessHeap(),0,buffer); To HeapFree(GetProcessHeap(),0,buffer);
Why are you adding new code with the if() statement in place again?
Note all these patches were written by Aric, and I mostly didn't modify them before sending them. When they're all applied and synch'ed up with what we have internally (which is almost the case), I'll start fixing up the problems that merging them has caused... unless they're rejected first ;)
Mike
Joris Huizer wrote:
Mike McCormack wrote:
ChangeLog: aric@codeweavers.com
- free allocated buffers
The other daty I saw a lot of patches changing things like if (buffer) HeapFree(GetProcessHeap(),0,buffer); To HeapFree(GetProcessHeap(),0,buffer);
Why are you adding new code with the if() statement in place again?
Alexandre didn't accepted my patch for the msi dll. I think he is waiting for the finishing of the msi merging. I'll have to redo the patch then anyway because it already conflicts to actual cvs.
bye michael