On 29 February 2012 11:12, Stefan Dösinger stefan@codeweavers.com wrote:
try 2: Invalidate the index buffer state as well, as the buffer might be an index buffer.
Otherwise unmodified reesend after the discussion from yesterday. This is for bugs 29079, 29897(suspected) and 30019.
I guess I didn't explicitly say it yesterday, but I think this should be deferred and fixed properly after 1.4. While in principle dropping VBOs might be ok as a temporary fix for the release, the vertex / index buffer code is pretty fragile in general, and I can't guarantee that this won't introduce more regressions than it fixes.
Am Mittwoch, 29. Februar 2012, 11:54:11 schrieb Henri Verbeet:
I guess I didn't explicitly say it yesterday, but I think this should be deferred and fixed properly after 1.4. While in principle dropping VBOs might be ok as a temporary fix for the release, the vertex / index buffer code is pretty fragile in general, and I can't guarantee that this won't introduce more regressions than it fixes.
Fine with me, just don't blame me that those bugs aren't fixed :-)
On 29 February 2012 13:32, Stefan Dösinger stefan@codeweavers.com wrote:
Fine with me, just don't blame me that those bugs aren't fixed :-)
Yeah well, 27600 was reported in June last year.