Re: Patch to improve Microsoft Office 2000 functionality

[Duane Clark]

Jeremy White wrote:
> ...
> by getting it out now, maybe some other folks will help out <grin>.

I'll be happy to sync this to the current CVS, test it out with the apps 
I have, and chop it up into a series of patches, if no one else wants to 
take that on.

Patch to improve Microsoft Office 2000 functionality

[Dimitrie O. Paun]

On Thu, 24 Jan 2002, Duane Clark wrote:
> I'll be happy to sync this to the current CVS, test it out with the apps 
> I have, and chop it up into a series of patches, if no one else wants to 
> take that on.

I suggest you pass the listview.c chucks over to me. I've just completed a
major update to the ListView ctrl, and (a) none of the updates in the
patch will apply, and (b) I have the code fresh in my mind.

--
Dimi.

Patch to improve Microsoft Office 2000 functionality

[Duane Clark]

Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Jan 2002, Duane Clark wrote:
> > I'll be happy to sync this to the current CVS, test it out with the apps 
> > I have, and chop it up into a series of patches, if no one else wants to 
> > take that on.
>
> I suggest you pass the listview.c chucks over to me. I've just completed a
> major update to the ListView ctrl, and (a) none of the updates in the
> patch will apply, and (b) I have the code fresh in my mind.

That would be fine. It looked like a few pieces of the listview code 
might still be needed, but definitely most of it is duplicated by the 
recent changes.

Patch to improve Microsoft Office 2000 functionality

[Dimitrie O. Paun]

On Fri, 25 Jan 2002, Duane Clark wrote:
> That would be fine. It looked like a few pieces of the listview code 
> might still be needed, but definitely most of it is duplicated by the 
> recent changes.

Indeed -- I glanced over the patch myself, and it seems some things do
still apply. At the moment I am working on the Common Controls
(dlls/comctl32), so you can just forward me all the dlls/comctl32/*
chunks if you want. So, I have to know:
 1. Do you want me to deal with dlls/comctl32?
 2. If so, should I extract the relevant parts, or are you gonna send them
to me when you disect the patch?

--
Dimi.

Patch to improve Microsoft Office 2000 functionality

[Duane Clark]

Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Jan 2002, Duane Clark wrote:
> > That would be fine. It looked like a few pieces of the listview code 
> > might still be needed, but definitely most of it is duplicated by the 
> > recent changes.
>
> Indeed -- I glanced over the patch myself, and it seems some things do
> still apply. At the moment I am working on the Common Controls
> (dlls/comctl32), so you can just forward me all the dlls/comctl32/*
> chunks if you want. So, I have to know:
> - Do you want me to deal with dlls/comctl32?
> - If so, should I extract the relevant parts, or are you gonna send them
>
> to me when you disect the patch?

You are welcome to the comctl32 stuff. It looks like their is plenty 
more to keep me occupied:-) I only got as far as the listview so far, so 
I really don't have the other parts split out yet. It will probably be 
just as easy to let you do that.