Hello All,
Here is the current DLL's Status Page. Ive made a number of changes since I last sent these partial pages to the dev-list. Here is a list of things I still need todo for completeness.
1) Proof Read! (against all my notes) 2) Doc links, (Thursday night Friday AM) 3) Send to Brian V for WWN coverage :) (Brian if you want you can get a early start) 4) Add/Remove todo's 5) changelog update 6) Give everyone a chance to respond.. Friday? ;) 7) diff -u & send 8) :)
Happy Holidays,
Tom
On December 16, 2003 08:49 pm, Tom wrote:
Here is the current DLL's Status Page.
Tom, it looks good, but I think it's getting too big. Why don't we break it in 3 pages: -- Base DLLs -- DirectX DLLs -- Multimedia DLLs
This also makes sense as some people don't care about DirectX/Multimedia while other mostly care about those (office users vs. gamers).
Whadayathink?
This is an intresting way of looking at it. The question is, do we have an active inventory of what constitutes as a "Base DLL" I remeber some infighting a while back about if the MFC DLLs counted or not. I think I might be rasing a dead issue though.
-Joshua
--- "Dimitrie O. Paun" dpaun@rogers.com wrote:
On December 16, 2003 08:49 pm, Tom wrote:
Here is the current DLL's Status Page.
Tom, it looks good, but I think it's getting too big. Why don't we break it in 3 pages: -- Base DLLs -- DirectX DLLs -- Multimedia DLLs
This also makes sense as some people don't care about DirectX/Multimedia while other mostly care about those (office users vs. gamers).
Whadayathink?
-- Dimi.
Dimitrie O Paun wrote:
On December 16, 2003 08:49 pm, Tom wrote:
Here is the current DLL's Status Page.
Tom, it looks good, but I think it's getting too big. Why don't we break it in 3 pages: -- Base DLLs -- DirectX DLLs -- Multimedia DLLs
This also makes sense as some people don't care about DirectX/Multimedia while other mostly care about those (office users vs. gamers).
Whadayathink?
Sounds good to me.
Happy Holiday's,
Tom