Patchwatcher online

[Dan Kegel]

OK, I've checked in the updated Patchwatcher source
http://code.google.com/p/winezeug/source/detail?r=177
and have turned email notifications back on.

I also told it to rerun the most recent 11 patches,
just to test that it's sending the good patches to
http://groups.google.com/group/wine-patches-filtered
again.

The results page
http://kegel.com/wine/patchwatcher/results/
looks nice and green; the blacklist at
http://winezeug.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/patchwatcher/blacklist.txt
filters out all the tests that tend to fail on my
test machine infrequently enough that they
show up in the five baseline test runs, but
frequently enough that they caused bogus
failure reports in the few hundered patches I've
processed.

It would be *very good* to whittle that blacklist down to zero.
I should update http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9916
with a script that runs just the problematic tests over
and over again.  (Or maybe I should start a new bug, that
one is pretty long.)

[Detlef Riekenberg]

On Fr, 2008-09-05 at 10:24 -0700, Dan Kegel wrote:
> The results page
> http://kegel.com/wine/patchwatcher/results/
> looks nice and green;

Opps, all developer send there Patches in September with "09" as minute,
and in August with "08" ...

:-)

And it would be very nice, when you hide the Email-Address to
block the bots, who collect spam targets.

[Dan Kegel]

On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 11:37 AM, Detlef Riekenberg  wrote:
> > http://kegel.com/wine/patchwatcher/results/
>
> Opps, all developer send there Patches in September with "09" as minute,
> and in August with "08" ...

Whoops!
> And it would be very nice, when you hide the Email-Address to
> block the bots, who collect spam targets.

Is that needed, given how the addresses are in the open on
the mailing list and all its archives?

[Henri Verbeet]

2008/9/9 Dan Kegel :
> > And it would be very nice, when you hide the Email-Address to
> > block the bots, who collect spam targets.
>
> Is that needed, given how the addresses are in the open on
> the mailing list and all its archives?

I doubt it, we're probably on every possible spam list anyway.