(I guess this is for Marcus)
I thought I had heard something about Local Server COM being in place now but when I went to try it with our product I saw no attempt to do it (error message about CLSCTX_LOCAL_SERVER registered but not supported).
So I looked at CoGetClassObject and I see that the Remote_CoGetClassObject (which I presume is attempting to do the LOCAL_SERVER) is only called if a local server is requested and an inproc server or handler is not.
Is there a good reason why the Remote_CoGetClassObject is not called on failure to detect a registered inproc server or handler (which the existing structure of the function supported)?
Bill
On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 09:16:45AM -0700, Medland, Bill wrote:
(I guess this is for Marcus)
I thought I had heard something about Local Server COM being in place now but when I went to try it with our product I saw no attempt to do it (error message about CLSCTX_LOCAL_SERVER registered but not supported).
So I looked at CoGetClassObject and I see that the Remote_CoGetClassObject (which I presume is attempting to do the LOCAL_SERVER) is only called if a local server is requested and an inproc server or handler is not.
Is there a good reason why the Remote_CoGetClassObject is not called on failure to detect a registered inproc server or handler (which the existing structure of the function supported)?
No, there is no good reason. I was just guessing here. Feel free to adapt the logic.
Ciao, Marcus
-
Marcus Meissner -
Medland, Bill