Re: d3dx9: Implement the different dlls

Oh okay, I resent a fixed patch.
Why isn't it possible to forward the functions of the other dlls to the d3dx8 ones?
Or is this just for keeping the code clean so that we don't have mixed d3dx8 and d3dx9_36 forwardings?

d3dx9: Implement the different dlls

[Marcus Meissner]

On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 03:23:32PM +0100, [e-mail] wrote:
> Oh okay, I resent a fixed patch.
> Why isn't it possible to forward the functions of the other dlls to the d3dx8 ones?
> Or is this just for keeping the code clean so that we don't have mixed d3dx8 and d3dx9_36 forwardings?

You can of course forward to d3dx8 if they are compatible, why not?

Ciao, Marcus

d3dx9: Implement the different dlls

[Maciej Kowalczyk]

Hi,
As it was in David Adam's patch case, here also you are forwarding  
d3dx8.D3DXVec3Normalize as D3DXVec2Normalize.
I think it's a typo and strikes me so much because it's a first line of  
the specfile.
I'm new to Wine, so please correct me if I'm wrong.

Maciej