Re: ws2_32: Use WSAWaitForMultipleEvents instead of WaitForSingleObject

[Dmitry Timoshkov]

"Kai Blin"  wrote:
> - HANDLE hEvent = INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE;
> - WSAEVENT event_array[1];

Is that change only to avoid passing &hEvent to WSAWaitForMultipleEvents?

ws2_32: Use WSAWaitForMultipleEvents instead of WaitForSingleObject

[Kai Blin]

On Monday 28 April 2008 13:39:38 Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> "Kai Blin"  wrote:
> > - HANDLE hEvent = INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE;
> > - WSAEVENT event_array[1];
>
> Is that change only to avoid passing &hEvent to WSAWaitForMultipleEvents?

Nope. WSAWaitForMultipleEvents expects an array of WSAEVENTs. So this seemed 
like the cleaner approach to do this.

Cheers,
Kai

ws2_32: Use WSAWaitForMultipleEvents instead ofWaitForSingleObject

[Dmitry Timoshkov]

"Kai Blin"  wrote:
> > > - HANDLE hEvent = INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE;
> > > - WSAEVENT event_array[1];
> >
> > Is that change only to avoid passing &hEvent to WSAWaitForMultipleEvents?
>
> Nope. WSAWaitForMultipleEvents expects an array of WSAEVENTs. So this seemed 
> like the cleaner approach to do this.

That's exactly what I pointed out above. In C both ways is an equivalent.