Hi,
I want to merge some Robert Dickenson's version of winfile (derived from the old winefile code in 2002) in the next time into winefile. At the same time I want to keep the code it in sync between the ReactOS code base and Wine.
What do you think about splitting the source file into several smaller modules? winefile.c is quite large with its 4223 lines.
Martin
Hi.
Martin Fuchs wrote:
Hi,
I want to merge some Robert Dickenson's version of winfile (derived from the old winefile code in 2002) in the next time into winefile. At the same time I want to keep the code it in sync between the ReactOS code base and Wine.
What do you think about splitting the source file into several smaller modules? winefile.c is quite large with its 4223 lines.
Martin
I don't know the Robert Dickenson's version of winfile, but in my opinion we should decide about the future of winefile. We're planning to add a new explorer application. In fact the reason to add it is that we need a separate process for shell usage, but I think it would be nice to make it an explorer-file-browser as well. This explorer should be designed to be similar with the windows version so that applications that need it could work. It means that winefile could be replaced by explorer and I'd not invest too much time in winefile. It's just my vision of future, in my opinion the best for Wine.
Jacek
On Fri, 2005-05-13 at 22:43 +0200, Jacek Caban wrote:
We're planning to add a new explorer application.
Who's "we"?
Dimi Paun wrote:
On Fri, 2005-05-13 at 22:43 +0200, Jacek Caban wrote:
We're planning to add a new explorer application.
Who's "we"?
Aren't we? I meant "we" as "wine developers", but maybe I should use "you" as I didn't participate in the discussion. Anyway, as I remember discussions on WineConf and wine-devel (and is documented on wiki), it is planned to add WineExplorer . Alexandre seams to agree that WineExplorer is the same as windows explorer.exe: http://www.winehq.org/hypermail/wine-devel/2004/12/0374.html. Or maybe your question is who is going to work on it?
Jacek
On Sat, 2005-05-14 at 12:50 +0200, Jacek Caban wrote:
Aren't we?
:) Of course, I just thought that maybe you were talking off the list with other folks. Nevermind, I was half joking anyway.