Should I resubmit this patch with the my functions moved to locale.c or ole2nls.c? Which one?
Alexandre Julliard To: Steve Lustbader/ANR/MS/PHILIPS@AMEC <julliard@winehq cc: wine-devel@winehq.com .com> Subject: Re: Languages/Locales Sent by: wine-devel-admin Classification: @winehq.com
10/07/2002 02:02 PM
steve.lustbader@philips.com writes:
I implemented these functions in codepage.c since similar functions (GetDefaultLangID and GetDefaultLCID) were already there. Why are these functions in this file, instead of in dlls/kernel/locale.c?
Because they are needed by ntdll. This will be fixed eventually.
It seems locales and languages aren't really implemented yet (just hardcoded to English) - is this going in for 1.0 or is it not planned for the immediate future?
Most of it is already implemented; the relevant stuff is in dlls/kernel/locale.c and ole/ole2nls.c.
-- Alexandre Julliard julliard@winehq.com
steve.lustbader@philips.com writes:
Should I resubmit this patch with the my functions moved to locale.c or ole2nls.c? Which one?
Not necessary, I've applied it as is, we'll move all these functions together when kernel is properly separated from ntdll.